spot_img

‘Not Everything Said In a Judgment Constitutes a Precedent’-

Date:

Share post:



the taxtalk

 497 total views ‘Not Everything Said In a Judgment Constitutes a Precedent’- Supreme Court Explains Distinction Between Obiter Dicta & Ratio Decidendi   The copy of the order is as under:  

The post ‘Not Everything Said In a Judgment Constitutes a Precedent’- Supreme Court Explains Distinction Between Obiter Dicta & Ratio Decidendi appeared first on The Tax Talk.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

Air France flight to Paris turns back to Osaka in Japan after malfunction

Reuters | | Posted by Zarafshan Shiraz, Tokyo An Air France KLM SA passenger plane flying...

Senior travel made easy: Tips for older adults to plan your summer getaway

Summer travel is a fantastic opportunity for older adults to explore new cultures, witness new...

Kashmir draws crowds as tourists seek refuge from rising temperatures

While most parts of the country are reeling under heat wave conditions, tourists are enjoying...

Egypt unearths mummification workshops, tombs in ancient burial ground of Saqqara to revive tourism industry

Egypt unearthed human and animal mummification workshops as well as two tombs in the ancient...
spot_img