Saturday, July 12, 2025

Creating liberating content

NEW DELHI: The GST Council, which will meet shortly, is

NEW DELHI: The rise in UPI payments has helped reduce

H D Kumaraswamy (File photo) NEW DELHI: Union minister H

Tesla will open its first showroom in India on Tuesday

Related News

NEW DELHI: The GST Council, which will meet shortly, is expected to comprehensively review the eight-year-old regime focused on reducing tax on several consumer-focused items in the 12% bracket as

NEW DELHI: The rise in UPI payments has helped reduce use of cash in India, a new paper by a team from IMF has said, while using proxies, such as

H D Kumaraswamy (File photo) NEW DELHI: Union minister H D Kumaraswamy on Friday launched the first scheme to provide customer facing incentives on purchase of electric trucks of up

Tesla will open its first showroom in India on Tuesday and begin deliveries as early as next month, people familiar with the matter said, as the Elon Musk-led electric vehicle

HYDERABAD: Breaking out from the shadows of glittering gold, silver hit a record Rs 1,13,000 a kg on MCX late Friday. It came on the back of international prices hit

It’s easy to think we’re connected just because we’re talking. But if you really look, it’s often something else. A text while walking, a call during chores, a quick reply

Trending News

NEW DELHI: The rise in UPI payments has helped reduce use of cash in India, a new paper by a team from IMF has said, while using proxies, such as

Tesla will open its first showroom in India on Tuesday and begin deliveries as early as next month, people familiar with the matter said, as the Elon Musk-led electric vehicle

NEW DELHI: Growth in gross direct tax collections moderated to 3.2% in the fiscal year up to July 10, from 4.9% three weeks ago, driven by a slowdown in non-corporation

In a bid to improve toll plaza efficiency and prepare for upcoming digital tolling upgrades, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has announced a stricter policy for blacklisting users

Tesla will finally start selling its cars in India, with the Maharashtra RTO clearing the way for Elon Musk’s electric vehicle giant to open its first showroom in Mumbai and

India’s net direct tax collections declined 1.34% year-on-year to Rs 5.63 lakh crore as of July 10, dragged down by a sharp surge in refunds, according to government data released

Nana Patekar gets relief as Court refused to act on Tanushree Dutta’s ‘Me Too’ allegations on the actor – deets inside | Hindi Movie News

Word Count: 653 | Estimated Reading Time: 4 minutes


Nana Patekar gets relief as Court refused to act on Tanushree Dutta's 'Me Too' allegations on the actor - deets inside

Tanushree Dutta had filed a complaint against Nana Patekar in October 2018 as she accused the actor of harassing and misbehaving with her on the sets of ‘Horn Ok Pleasss’. This created a huge stir and started the whole ‘Me Too’ movement on social media. Later in 2019, the police filed the final report before the magistrate court stating that probe did not find anything incriminating against any of the accused. The FIR was found to be false, the police further said in its report. In legal terms, such a report is called a ‘B-summary’.
Now, a Mumbai court has finally given its judgement on the matter. The court has refused to take cognisance of “MeToo” allegations against Nana. The reason given for this was that, Tanushree had filed the complaint, “beyond the period of limitation” and did not even explain the reason for the delay in complaint. The actress had filed the complaint in 2018 and had accused Nana of harassing her in 2008, with no specific reason in the delay for filing the complaint.
Thus, Judicial Magistrate First Class (Andheri) NV Bansal said that Dutta filed an FIR in 2018 over an incident that allegedly occurred on March 23, 2008. The magistrate said that Tanushree had filed an FIR in 2018 under the Indian Penal Code sections 354 and 509 over an incident that allegedly occurred on March 23, 2008. The magistrate added, “no reason before me to take cognisance after a long lapse of more than 7 years after the expiry of the period of limitation.”
The magistrate also said, “If such a huge delay is condoned without any sufficient cause, then it will be against the principle of equity and true spirit of the law. Thus this is not within limitation and the court is barred to take cognisance of the same.”
Thus, the magistrate disposed of the B Summary report, saying it “cannot be dealt with due to bar of taking cognisance”.
Neither Tanushree, nor Nana have reacted after this decision by the court.





Source link

Most Popular Articles