Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Creating liberating content

MUMBAI: When people think about luxury brands, they associate them

MUMBAI: Zerodha co-founder and billionaire investor Nikhil Kamath has invested

Top stocks to buy today (AI image) Stock market recommendations:

MUMBAI: Markets regulator Sebi has rejected a plea by Anil

Related News

MUMBAI: When people think about luxury brands, they associate them with huge brick-and-mortar stores. But players in this space are challenging that conventional norm – from global brands Bvlgari, Chanel,

MUMBAI: Zerodha co-founder and billionaire investor Nikhil Kamath has invested in film actor Shah Rukh Khan’s spirits business, increasing his involvement in the country’s alcobev sector following his stake purchase

Top stocks to buy today (AI image) Stock market recommendations: According to Mehul Kothari, DVP – Technical Research, Anand Rathi Shares and Stock Brokers, Intellect Design, Diffusion Engineers, and Sumitomo

MUMBAI: Markets regulator Sebi has rejected a plea by Anil Ambani to settle charges related to investments in lender Yes Bank, potentially exposing him to at least a Rs 1,828

MUMBAI: In its efforts to make investing in India easier for investors of all types, markets regulator Sebi is aiming to make IPO filing through a template , optimising existing

NEW DELHI: Retail inflation slowed to an eight-year low in July due to moderating food prices. Also, the easing trend continued for the ninth month in a row, providing comfort

Trending News

JSW Cement, the building materials arm of Sajjan Jindal-led JSW Group, has reduced the size of its upcoming initial public offering (IPO) to Rs 3,600 crore and will open the

The agricultural Gross Value Added (GVA) growth is expected to moderate to 4.5% in the first quarter of FY26, down from 5.4% in the preceding quarter, according to a report

Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) turned net sellers in the Indian equity market in July, pulling out Rs 17,741 crore amid rising global trade tensions. According to data from NSDL, this

Avenue Capital Group-backed Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd (ARCIL) has filed its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with markets regulator Sebi on Friday to raise funds through an initial public

Russia-backed Nayara Energy looks at India’s state-run oil companies to offload petrol, diesel exports Nayara Energy has approached Indian state-run oil marketing companies (OMCs) to offload its export volumes of

US President Donald Trump on Saturday claimed that he had “heard” reports of India halting Russian oil imports, hailing it as a “good step”. “I understand that India is no

Calling Someone ‘Miyan-Tiyan’, ‘Pakistani’ Not An Offence: Supreme Court

Word Count: 263 | Estimated Reading Time: 2 minutes




New Delhi:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that calling someone ‘Miyan-Tiyan’ or ‘Pakistani’ may be in poor taste but does not amount to an offence of hurting religious sentiments. A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made the observation while closing a case against a man accused of calling a government servant ‘Pakistani’.

The complaint was filed by an Urdu translator and an acting clerk in Jharkhand. According to the complainant, when he visited the accused to furnish information about a Right To Information (RTI) application, the latter abused him by referring to his religion and used criminal force to prevent the discharge of his official duties.

This led to a first information report against the man for offences under Sections 298 (hurting religious sentiments), 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharging duty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Turning down an order by the Jharkhand High Court, the top court said, “The appellant is accused of hurting the religious feelings of the informant by calling him ‘Miyan-Tiyan’ and ‘Pakistani’. Undoubtedly, the statements made are in poor taste. However, it does not amount to hurting the religious sentiments of the informant,” the bench said.

According to the top court, there was no act on the accused’s part that could have provoked a breach of peace.

“Evidently, there was no assault or use of force by the appellant to attract Section 353 IPC (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharging duty),” it said.




Source link

Most Popular Articles